Thursday, May 27, 2010

We Say Promote Everyone To Lieutenant!

Is this what it looked like when they were deciding to promote forty something extra Lieutenants?

We're still looking forward to seeing the numbers to show that the department is saving money by doing this - Overtime for firefighters and medics sure seems readily available lately.

Thursday, May 27th


Engine 412 - 2 LTs
Truck 436 - 2 LTs
Engine 421 - 2 LTs
Engine 410 - 1 Captain, 1 LT
Rescue 418 - 2 LTs
Engine 405 - 1 Captain and 2 LTs (3 Officers!)
Engine 422 - 2 LTs
Engine 426 - 1 LT, 1 Captain
Engine 419 - 2 LTs
Tower 424 - 2 LTs


Granted a couple of the above are for a partial 24 hour shift but it does smell like someone made a mistake or was given bad information and made a bad decision.

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

The List Goes On and On

Here is another update on how the FCFRD claims to save citizen tax monies.

Today May 25th - C-Shift is working. Multiple Lieutenants and Captains are riding the following units:

Rescue 401 - 2 LTs
Truck 438 - 2 LTs
Engine 440 - 1 Capt, 1 LT
Engine 410 - 1 Capt, 1 LT
Truck 410 - 2 LTs
Rescue 418 - 2 LTs
Engine 428 - 1 Capt, 1 LT
Engine 422 - 1 Capt, 1 LT
Engine 426 - 1 Capt, 2 LT (3 Officers!)
Engine 419 - 1 Capt, 1 LT
Engine 414 - 2 LTs

What's interesting here is that Fire Stations 26 and 10 have a 1 for 1 ratio (supervisor to subordinate) which must really infuriate other county agencies. Word on the street is that the Board of Supervisors and County Executive are now looking into this fiasco. We wonder how the Fire Chief is explaining this mess. Thanks Big Eye!

And no one can explain how this is saving the department money. Looks like they have been asking for Medics to sign up for O/T everyday. How many of these newly promoted Officer's dropped their Medic status after promotion in the last two years?

Friday, May 14, 2010

Specific Examples of Haste Makes Waste

Note: Submitted to us by The Green Eye:

We would like to follow up to the "Haste Makes Waste" posting. Today the following units have multiple Officers assigned to them.

On Friday, May 14th A shift is working:

Truck 425 - 0700-1900
Engine 439 - 1900-0700
Engine 430 - 1900-0700
Engine 408 - 24 hours - and a Fire Lieut. is driving the engine!
Engine 422 - 24 hours
Engine 426 - 0700-1900
Engine 420 - 24 hours
Tower 424 - 24 hours
Engine 416 - 1900-0700

And check this out next A-shift day on May 19th Engine 410 is riding with two Lieutenants and a Captain. That is 8 extra Lieutenants today. Does anyone see something wrong with this?

Having an All Hazard Officer ride the Engine as a medic isn't an excuse. You could have paid him Technician pay to do the same job before promoting him from thirty something on the list.

To those who are confused about the numbers, please take note more information will follow. Don't let the fire department give you screwed up numbers.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Haste Makes Waste - An Open Editorial

Haste Makes Waste
Submitted to Brother Big Eye
by the Concerned Firefighters and Officers of Fairfax

Does the school system promote 40 teachers to assistant principals but use them as teacher’s aides because they have too many assistant principals? Or maybe they take turns being Assistant Principle while the other is doing basic teacher duties for the day? The fire dept likes to call this job sharing.

Does the police department promote 40 sergeants or lieutenants and assign multiple ones to drive each other around? Do they double up at police stations because there are so many of them? Do they just work as street police officers as minimum staffing as part of their current shift? Maybe they take turns too job sharing like the fire dept. And everyone gets paid a hefty amount.

You may or may not find this to be interesting but we can't help but wonder how fire dept administration continues to make numerous promotions when the rest of the county is in a "budget crisis". Especially when many of these promoted will still work in a fire fighter rank position. Granted this doesn't happen to all of them all of the time but our study shows in the last 90 days there have been multiple Lieutenants assigned to work as fire fighters approximately 85% of the time. Meaning there are two officers on one fire unit. This happens because we have promoted too many Officers. Is this called mismanagement? And to our surprise one unit in particular, Rescue Company 401 has had three lieutenants assigned to it at one time on multiple days. Three of the four personnel assigned and riding that unit were supervisors. What? And the Fire Chief justifies making more promotions?

The Fire Chief does this because they removed the EMS Lieutenants from many of the Medic Units. But rather then be a fiscally responsible leader and turn those positions in he and his staff keep those numbers and promote approximately 35 (now 40) fire fighters to lieutenants. Is this because of the pressure from both the firefighter and officer unions?

The park service or libraries wouldn't keep extra supervisor positions just because they're in the budget. That would be called wasteful spending.

Hence the 100K a year fire fighter. The average annual base salary of a Lieutenant is reaching a 100K this is what they earn to do the same job of a fire fighter. Now admittedly it’s not every day the same Lieutenant is working in a fire fighter rank position but this happens much more frequently than ever before. Recent numbers showed approximately 8-10 fire units having at least two officers assigned to them consistently across all three shifts. How does the department or Ops 6 spin those numbers to the Board of Supervisors?

Last week fire department senior staff approved approximately four lieutenant, four captain I and four captain II promotions. These were supposedly to fill vacancies. However, didn't the fire department budget have to relinquish some positions? Capt II in Investigations, Deputy Chief in Special Projects and four Lieutenants from Communications? The only ones that were really affected were the Lieutenants. Now they will be sent to the field to ride fire units assigned as fire fighters not Lieutenants. But they will continue to the hold rank and pay of a Lieutenant. Again this is because of excessive officers.

We remember when the Fire Chief spoke to the BOS during the public safety committee hearing. He was asked if these new Lieutenants would be used at Battalion Chief Drivers. His reply was, "no they would not". This however is not the current situation. The past year has shown battalion chiefs assigning themselves lieutenants as drivers due to surplus lieutenants assigned to the field. Surprisingly, our research has showed some fire station shifts to have a 1 to 1.5 supervisor to subordinate ratio. (5 Lieutenants or higher rank to 6 fire fighter/technicians.) This is too much even for the fire service.

The Fire Chief will say these promotions saved money in overtime. However again he's not telling the whole story which is overtime for firefighters and paramedics has increased. Furthermore some of the lieutenants promoted were paramedics as well. They dropped their medic certification which resulted in increased medic overtime because those lieutenants didn't want to ride as medics any longer after their promotion.

The reason we are exposing this information is because we have witnessed waste and mismanagement for far too long. You have too! Our credibility has been proven from past correspondence and we remain confident if addressed appropriately the right actions can be taken to minimize impact of FRD and the general county budget not only now but in the future.
Our question to you the members; Do you care? If so, please consider submitting emails with information of wasteful spending and staffing. We will follow-up and expose the issues to the proper people. The Union and other associations have their own agenda which is fine but we feel no one wants to take on the major issues with OUR fire and rescue department. Make your comments known sign up and be heard…

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Congrats to Contra Costa and Fairfax City Fire!

Editors Note: This editorial was submitted by a reader who called themselves "Aye Eye Captain". The Big Eye doesn't agree with a lot of this editorial, but we post it in the interest of a free exchange of opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------

Congrats to Contra Costa and Fairfax City Fire!
By Aye Eye Captain


Yes congratulations to Contra Costa and Fairfax City Fire Departments! We hope that both Louder and Rohr care more about your departments then they did their last several years with Fairfax County Fire and Rescue. We hope their status quo; lame duck work ethic along with their arrogant attitude makes a change for the better. If anyone is doubting this or starts to think oh boy here we go again with the negativity then please take the time to write one or maybe two sentences of what Rohr, Louder or for that matter Caussin and Mastin have done for this once great fire and rescue department. Seriously, go ahead and send something to Brother Big Eye or post something in the comment section.

OK they did do something positive. It was for themselves and for themselves only. Well Louder did something positive for all of us by marrying Christine and taking her away from us. Thanks Daryl, for that we’ll contribute to your retirement party. Ok haven’t thought of anything positive yet… EMS Redesign that’s something good right? Nope. Wrong. That is what some of us Christian folks call an abortion. How is it better then what we had before? A 64 page study that was written by EMS Admin showed the efforts and challenges of EMS Redesign really has not paid off. Actually it has created much more of a mess within the EMS system and Operations and let us not forget that it costs more. Ok next let’s see ummm oh training and mentoring of officers and fire fighters. Nope wrong again. Let’s all say it together – “LORTON!” - Among the many other incidents those haven’t been made public yet both pre and post Lorton. Well we did have quarterly officer training. Yep we sure did and we learned all about the new Ambulance bus. Oh and we remember when Christine talked and talked and talked about the new EMS system until she was asked questions from the audience then she stopped talking. Hmm? Maybe we’re not being fair here. What else happened during those quarterly training meetings? Not much except for some real basic stuff that was fun to listen to as we got paid overtime for being there.

A/C Dave Rohr what have you done? Oh that’s right you tagged along on some USAR deployments. Interesting if an Assistant Chief of Operations has such an important position with many responsibilities how can he force himself to tag along on deployments for days and days at a time? And what exactly did you offer by going? Give us something positive you did on those deployments. I mean come on at least we saw Duke make copies and set up a nice work desk. Oh yea the news cameras. Those same news cameras where you admitted that your fire and rescue department should have saved a citizen from a nickel and dime fire. You remember that same citizen was on the phone with 911 for two minutes after the first units arrived. Those same news cameras where you said, “we should have found her”,”I think we had opportunities to find her”, and the infamous “our post incident analysis will help us find out what happened and we’ll train better”. What is really interesting here is that never, not once was the “accountability” word ever mentioned. Damn it Dave you were the acting Fire Chief. Right then and there was your chance to show us the fireman and officer you once were but you did nothing. Nothing happened. We waited and heard some scuttlebutt but nothing happened. Except for maybe telling some folks on the close-call committee that they couldn’t report what they really found. So accountability huh, wow how quick you and your cohorts were to use that word when it came to basic disciplinary issues but not once did you ever use it reference your actions or lack thereof. (Author’s note; we remember when you were decent in the field but sadly you sold yourself out Dave. Yes, you really did). “We’re gonna look into this and find the problems and train our folks based on the findings of the incident analysis”. If you cared and we mean if you really cared a lot would have changed and we all would have had a chance to learn and make sure this doesn’t happen again at least under your watch. No sir. What did Operations Chief Dave Rohr do? You made promotions of personnel to the rank of up to battalion chief that have never ever rode the seat of an engine or truck. To make matters worse you allowed personnel to be promoted to fire lieutenant where she never was qualified to even ride a truck bucket. You allowed personnel to ride as battalion chief where he/she hasn’t ridden an engine in over 10-15 years or more. Not even as a firefighter on a suppression piece. If you cared this would not have happened under your watch. How the heck do you allow this to happen? Have you even listened to the radio traffic lately? Your contribution was the All-Hazard Officer who in turn are now very hazardous to all of our health both citizens and fire fighters alike. What were you thinking!?

Hello Louder, Hello?, Louder, HELLO, WHAT!? Daryl Louder we can’t think of anything too bad or good you have caused except for what we mentioned earlier. Thanks again. You do have some dysfunctional folks working with you but that’s par for the course. You and your bride look good together and we appreciate you trying to help her along but understand it would have been career suicide if you helped too much. We do have one question, have you ever heard of car pooling? It’s really catching on in the west coast.

Assistant Chief John Caussin now before you get all fired up ranting and raving like Joe Biden. Calm down take a deep breath and know this is your chance to make some positive change to Operations. Even though you too proved you really don’t care and yes it shows in the way you allowed for a very screwed up promotional and career development system to stay in place. Come on you know its wrong just like Rohr knows it’s wrong to promote incompetence. Were the both of you sitting around one day talking about the good days and decided to place bets on who could screw the folks in the field the most. Seriously John and then you send out an even more screwed up career development matrix. You know it doesn’t work and you know the mess this has caused but you just continue with the meetings, and committee meetings and more meetings, rant and rave but nothing to show that you know what you’re doing or that you even care. What we don’t understand is how you allow these screwed up promotional test to occur? Ok, ready, go… ask us some basic questions, record it, and listen to it and bingo we’re now a Captain. That is not how to conduct promotions. Don’t give us the budget excuse we both know better than that. We understand that taking over Operations is another feather in your cap and a step towards wherever you want to end up BUT all we ask is that this time show us you care. Not what you know or don’t know but show us true genuine concern for the folks in the field. Stop promoting incompetence. Take the new B/C list and be smart on how you promote field battalion chiefs. Make sure they have the right experience. We’re going to be watching and we’ll be sure to let you know how you’re doing not how you think you’re doing. By all means if you want some help just ask we’ll be glad to provide you some advice.

It is sad that we can’t think of a positive contribution any of you have made in your positions of great authority. Let’s hope this changes soon especially with the new deputies.

And Fire Chief Ron Mastin. Who?

Monday, May 3, 2010

Retiree COLA Message From President Niemiec

Brothers and Sisters:

At last week's Uniformed Retirement System (URS) Meeting, staff informed the
Board of Trustees that retirees will be receiving a 2.3% cost-of-living- adjustment (COLA) which will be effective July 1, 2010. The COLA increase is due to the Washington area Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) for the twelve months ending March 31, 2010. This automatic COLA, according to code, is equal to the CPI-U increase up to a maximum of 4%. The Board of Trustees may grant an "Ad-Hoc" COLA up to 1% should there be an "actuarial surplus" as defined by current code. Based upon the retirement fund's actuary, the fund does not have a surplus and thus, no Ad-Hoc COLA will be awarded this coming fiscal year effective July, 1, 2010. Accordingly, if
the Board of Supervisors revised or changed the definition of how an Ad-Hoc COLA is awarded - the actuary's study will be unchanged - no Ad-Hoc COLA. Additionally, I believe it is worth noting that Anthony Griffin, the County Executive, and Robert Mears, the Executive Director of the Retirement Agency, went on record to state that they are confident that no Ad-Hoc COLA
will be awarded to retirees for at least 5 years. In other words, retiree COLAs will be based on the Washington area CPI-U ending in the month of March.

The Local 2068 Executive Board, with unanimous approval from all board members, was entertaining the possibility of changing the retiree's annual COLA to a fixed-rate of 3%. While the fixed-rate COLA met resistance amongst some of the membership, a motion was passed at April's General Membership Meeting to keep the concept of a fixed-rate COLA for future
consideration. Please note that any change to the Code of Fairfax would require support from the Board of Supervisors.

That said, with any future consideration of changing the retiree's COLA determination, the membership will be notified and educated about such change(s).

In Solidarity and Respectfully Submitted,

John R. Niemiec

President

In-Fighting Over Retirement COLA

EDITORS NOTE: Original email at bottom. Both emails were sent to numerous additional FRD personnel, who were included in the original email, as well as the response email (we edited out the people who were cc'd in each email). We decided to post this email exchange, because it had been widely circulated, and we felt that the issue was important to our readers.

Brother Big Eye
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Kotecki, Dennis"
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:56:10 -0400
To: Boswell, Karrie L.; NUMEROUS OTHER PEOPLE, EDITED OUT BY BIG EYE

Subject: RE: Retirement board


Leigh,
Maybe he is running because he wants to change something for the good in his opinion. Why did you run for executive board? I was at the April union meeting and it was sad to see you asking Mohler about these very retirement issues while the county exec. was speaking. Not only were you rude, it showed your lack of knowledge in this arena. Usually when people run for some sort of election they feel in their mind something needs to be changed, so kudos to Danny for doing that. If you have an issue with him, talk or email him directly. Your little stunt of including the whole fire dept. in this email has not won any points with me and it only proves what many already think, that you and others are purposely going after Nemo and Danny. Why did I get this email anyway? Please take me off your list. Thanks John and Danny for the work that you do.

Dennis

Lieutenant Dennis Kotecki
Fairfax County Fire and Rescue Department
Fire Station 11 A-Shift
Work (703)765-4404
Fax (703)765-0149


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Boswell, Karrie L.
Sent: Fri 4/30/2010 8:53 AM
To: Gray, Daniel V., NUMEROUS OTHER PEOPLE, EDITED OUT BY BIG EYE
Subject: Retirement board


Danny,

I am curious to know after the executive board meeting the other day where you stated that following the initial failed attempt to change the retirement COLA from it's current formula which uses the CPI rate and an AD HOC to a flat 3% rate that you decided to run for the retirement board. What exactly is it that you took issue with.

I see the system as having worked exactly the way it is supposed to work. John proposed something, the executive board supported it, the retirees didn't, we took it to the membership they ask for a town hall meeting and I assume we are working on that now. What could or should have been done differently in your opinion? What part of this process would have changed except maybe you could have seconded John's motion at the retirement board. Which in my opinion would have been a horrific mistake because as it turns out the membership stated loudly at the April GM meeting they wanted a town hall meeting in order to get more information.

This really seems more politically motivated as opposed to what really is in the best interest of the membership. Rich is a strong hard working member of the IAFF. I cannot help but to believe that if we continue to overload a few on the board particularly those who have a huge work load already that we are at risk to have something fall through the cracks. Having a member who clearly understands the pillars that define us as a labor organization isolated to having one major focus (retirement board) seems inherently smarter from a logistical standpoint. I support you strongly as our Secretary/Treasurer. I have told you on numerous occasions that I trust you with the oversight and management of our nearly 1 million dollar budget. I just feel that we are making a mistake by continuing to make choices that work to disenfranchise members who are not on the executive board; furthermore, from the perspective of someone like myself who is nearing retirement actions like these produce an erosion of our leadership pipeline.

Since it appears we are going to have a run off you are going to have to explain what you bring to the table if you want my support. Especially after I saw the information generated by Rich as it relates to the compounding loss that could be potentially felt over a 20 year period to future retirees. This was solid research that was ask for and produced to the executive board. He did exactly what we ask him to do. He served us and the members.

This whole thing is being sold as a double bill of goods. The retirees were told it's a good financial choice for them because they will get more money and the incumbents were told it's a move that protects your pension trust. This is impossible how can something serve to both produce more dividends and act as security gate to the solvency of the trust. Sounds like somebody is telling whoever they are talking to what they want to hear

Leigh

______________________________________

Karrie L. Boswell
Fairfax County Fire & Rescue Department
Lieutenant - Fire Station 14 B Shift
Battalion Representative
IAFF Local 2068- 1st Battalion

(O) 703-437-7575
(O) 703-591-9271
(C) 571-259-0721
(P) 703-331-4892